Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 125

Thread: Why is there Something Instead of God?

  1. Top | #21
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,468
    Rep Power
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Speakpigeon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lion IRC View Post
    somewhere in amongst all of the possible worlds/universes/multiverses/megaverses there is one where God exists - where it's impossible for Him not to exist.
    What kind of god would that be that would not exist everywhere?!

    One universe with a god among infinitely many without one. A god of small things?!
    EB

    Dont quibble about the nature of 'something' when the Op says that's all there is.

  2. Top | #22
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,383
    Archived
    3,946
    Total Posts
    5,329
    Rep Power
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Lion IRC View Post
    Dont quibble about the nature of 'something' when the Op says that's all there is.
    What's nothing and where is it?

    Maybe it too, like God, is in some other possible universe?

  3. Top | #23
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Between two cities
    Posts
    1,935
    Archived
    56
    Total Posts
    1,991
    Rep Power
    22
    Can we clarify then ,whether we can agree to accept Heaven as a different plane/universe or dimension ?

  4. Top | #24
    Contributor DBT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
    Posts
    8,551
    Archived
    17,906
    Total Posts
    26,457
    Rep Power
    69
    The Bible is not clear on that. There are verses that strongly suggest that Heaven was believed to be a physical place above the dome of the sky.

  5. Top | #25
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Between two cities
    Posts
    1,935
    Archived
    56
    Total Posts
    1,991
    Rep Power
    22
    Ok then, shall we agree on physical place above the dome of the sky ?

  6. Top | #26
    Contributor DBT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
    Posts
    8,551
    Archived
    17,906
    Total Posts
    26,457
    Rep Power
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by Learner View Post
    Ok then, shall we agree on physical place above the dome of the sky ?
    You would agree that this is a possibility?

  7. Top | #27
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Between two cities
    Posts
    1,935
    Archived
    56
    Total Posts
    1,991
    Rep Power
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by DBT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Learner View Post
    Ok then, shall we agree on physical place above the dome of the sky ?
    You would agree that this is a possibility?
    It depends on you , because the OP question would then need to be altered. i.e. God exists in the physical place above the dome.

  8. Top | #28
    Contributor DBT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
    Posts
    8,551
    Archived
    17,906
    Total Posts
    26,457
    Rep Power
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by Learner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DBT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Learner View Post
    Ok then, shall we agree on physical place above the dome of the sky ?
    You would agree that this is a possibility?
    It depends on you , because the OP question would then need to be altered. i.e. God exists in the physical place above the dome.

    I'm not sure of the point of this, or where this is going. It has nothing to do with me, but let's say that someone agrees that Heaven is a physical place situated above the Dome of the Sky.....what then? Where does this lead?

  9. Top | #29
    Contributor Speakpigeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Paris, France, EU
    Posts
    6,135
    Archived
    3,662
    Total Posts
    9,797
    Rep Power
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Lion IRC View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Speakpigeon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lion IRC View Post
    somewhere in amongst all of the possible worlds/universes/multiverses/megaverses there is one where God exists - where it's impossible for Him not to exist.
    What kind of god would that be that would not exist everywhere?!

    One universe with a god among infinitely many without one. A god of small things?!
    EB

    Dont quibble about the nature of 'something' when the Op says that's all there is.
    The OP is crap but who needs the OP? If we're of a not too quibbling nature about definitions, any something sure is a god unto itself.

    So, yeah, where there's something, there's a god.
    EB

  10. Top | #30
    Contributor Speakpigeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Paris, France, EU
    Posts
    6,135
    Archived
    3,662
    Total Posts
    9,797
    Rep Power
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by DBT View Post
    Knowledge:

    ''Why not say that knowledge is true belief?

    ''The standard answer is that to identify knowledge with true belief would be implausible because a belief that is true just because of luck does not qualify as knowledge. Beliefs that are lacking justification are false more often than not. However, on occasion, such beliefs happen to be true.

    The analysis of knowledge may be approached by asking the following question: What turns a true belief into knowledge? An uncontroversial answer to this question would be: the sort of thing that effectively prevents a belief from being true as a result of epistemic luck. Controversy begins as soon as this formula is turned into a substantive proposal. According to evidentialism, which endorses the JTB+ conception of knowledge, the combination of two things accomplishes this goal: evidentialist justification plus degettierization (a condition that prevents a true and justified belief from being "gettiered"). However, according to an alternative approach that has in the last three decades become increasingly popular, what stands in the way of epistemic luck, what turns a true belief into knowledge is the reliability of the cognitive process that produced the belief. Consider how we acquire knowledge of our physical environment: we do so through sense experience. Sense experiential processes are, at least under normal conditions, highly reliable. There is nothing accidental about the truth of the beliefs these processes produce. Thus beliefs produced by sense experience, if true, should qualify as instances of knowledge. An analogous point could be made for other reliable cognitive processes, such as introspection, memory, and rational intuition. We might, therefore, say that what turns true belief into knowledge is the reliability of our cognitive processes.''
    Crap.
    EB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •