Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: A Christian Group is Angry That Hawaii Asked Non-Profits to Follow IRS Rules

  1. Top | #1
    Veteran Member phands's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
    Posts
    1,976
    Archived
    1
    Total Posts
    1,977
    Rep Power
    28

    A Christian Group is Angry That Hawaii Asked Non-Profits to Follow IRS Rules

    More true xtian hypocrisy....

    Here’s a perfect example of a Christian Right group complaining about a problem that doesn’t exist.

    Back in July, because the primaries and midterm elections were coming up, Hawaii’s Attorney General issued a press release reminding all non-profit organizations that there was a limit to their political activity
    This wasn’t even a warning. It was intended as a helpful notice to all non-profit organizations at a time when they may be tempted to break IRS rules.
    Organizations exempt from income tax under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), which include churches, private schools, universities, and humanitarian organizations, pay no federal or Hawaii income taxes and must operate exclusively for their tax-exempt purposes. Federal tax law specifically bars such organizations from participating or intervening in political campaigns on behalf of any candidate for public office. This means that organizations cannot directly or indirectly advocate on behalf of candidates, cannot publish or distribute statements supporting or opposing candidates, and cannot make contributions to political campaign funds.
    If a charitable organization violates this prohibition, the IRS may revoke the organization’s valuable tax-exempt status. The members of a charitable organization’s governing body may also be in breach of their fiduciary duties to the organization if they allow the organization’s assets to be used for any prohibited political intervention rather than for charitable purposes.


    None of this is news to anyone running a non-profit. It shouldn’t be, anyway. It’s literally what you sign up for when your group becomes a non-profit and what you’re willing to give away in exchange for a tax exemption.

    The press release also noted that non-profits could advocate for issues, if not candidates. Groups could encourage voting in general. Individuals associated with the non-profits could, of course, express their political views as long as it was done in a personal capacity. Finally, Hawaii encouraged non-profits to develop internal policies to “educate board members” about these rules, to provide equal time to candidates in public forums and debates, and to monitor their social media to make sure nothing slipped through that crossed the lines.

    Again, all of this was perfectly reasonable.

    So, naturally, Christians are now pretending like it was religious persecution.

    The right-wing conservative group Alliance Defending Freedom sent a letter to Attorney General Russell A. Suzuki whining about how he had gone overboard by reminding everyone of the rules of the game.
    The tax code restrictions that the Hawaii AG referenced in his “guidance” are federal and may only be enforced by the Internal Revenue Service, not a state attorney general. The fact that he released guidance on a law he has no authority or ability to enforce makes it clear that the “guidance” was nothing more than a tactic to intimidate houses of worship from speaking during this election season.
    Somehow, a helpful guide to all non-profits was taken as a threat to churches.


    Because that’s how these Christians think. If you so much as breathe in their direction, they’ll find a way to accuse you of hating Jesus.

    Here’s an example of what I mean, from ADF:
    It’s also worth noting that religious leaders do not surrender their First Amendment freedoms when they enter the ministry. Acting individually, they enjoy the same right to speak as any other citizen. They may freely support or oppose political candidates without violating federal tax law or jeopardizing their church’s tax-exempt status.

    Yes. That’s correct. That’s also exactly what the attorney general said.
    The law also does not restrict the free expression of opinions by individuals or leaders who are associated with charitable organizations. Statements advocating for the election or defeat of a candidate by an exempt organization’s leadership, however, may threaten the organization’s tax-exempt status unless the leaders clearly indicate that their comments do not represent the views of the organization and there is no appearance that the organization’s resources were used to issue the statement.


    So what the hell are these Christians complaining about?
    This vague and misleading “guidance” from the Attorney General of Hawaii is nothing more than an attempt to use federal tax law to silence the voice of houses of worship.

    Bullshit. That is another Christian lie. The state’s government wasn’t trying to silence churches — and we know that because we can read the letter for ourselves, something ADF’s members are apparently incapable of doing if they believe the spin. The guidance didn’t even single out churches. So even if there was any attempt at silencing groups, it would’ve applied to all non-profits equally.

    This needs to be reiterated: Christian persecution doesn’t exist in the U.S.
    That means groups like ADF, that claim to protect Christians when they’re being persecuted, have to make up their own problems. These people would find a reason to claim a coin flip was rigged against Christians. They should never be taken seriously.


    Read more at http://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2...llow-irs-rules
    “Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it.” Terry Pratchett

  2. Top | #2
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Layton, UT
    Posts
    1,516
    Rep Power
    11
    The good news is most people who care know this already. Churches aren't technically even 501(c)(3) organizations, since they are not subject to audits or any kind of oversight, so they already don't have to play by most of the rules of secular organizations. That clearly isn't enough for them, though, since they continue to whine, like clockwork whenever they get reminded that there are some restrictions on what they can do.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-16-2018, 07:55 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-20-2018, 03:46 PM
  3. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 09-01-2016, 12:48 PM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-04-2015, 12:40 AM
  5. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 07-30-2014, 08:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •