Page 137 of 137 FirstFirst ... 3787127135136137
Results 1,361 to 1,366 of 1366

Thread: New report on climate change released today

  1. Top | #1361
    Contributor repoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6,302
    Archived
    2,280
    Total Posts
    8,582
    Rep Power
    73
    Angelo, what is your answer to post #1354?

    If I were moderator you would have to fully answer it or you be not allowed to post anymore in this thread.

    And this is not some topic like white privilege that can be danced around. This is impartial nuts and bolts physics.



    If the pump analogy is wrong prove it. How did CO2 get to 408 ppm?
    Sam Smith is a He.

  2. Top | #1362
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    24,107
    Archived
    96,752
    Total Posts
    120,859
    Rep Power
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by angelo View Post
    The scientific method is never on the side of anything but is an ongoing cycle of experimentation and observation. For many years there was a consensus that stress caused stomach ulcers until a couple of Australian scientists discovered it was caused by bacteria and the consensus collapsed like a stack of cards.

    But when it comes to GW/CC/CD, the scientific method is completely thrown out by the wayside, just like members of a cult will ignore all proof placed in front of their own eyes that their beliefs are nonsense. There are thousands of real scientists, not alarmists who call out GW/CC/CD for the giant hoax that it is.
    It's the deniers that throw the scientific method in the trash. Virtually 100% of their "science" is deceptive stuff directed at non-scientists. Much of it has serious flaws that can be spotted by anyone with a scientific background.

  3. Top | #1363
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    24,107
    Archived
    96,752
    Total Posts
    120,859
    Rep Power
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by repoman View Post
    Angelo, what is your answer to post #1354?

    If I were moderator you would have to fully answer it or you be not allowed to post anymore in this thread.

    And this is not some topic like white privilege that can be danced around. This is impartial nuts and bolts physics.



    If the pump analogy is wrong prove it. How did CO2 get to 408 ppm?
    Their marching instructions don't cover how to address reality.

  4. Top | #1364
    Elder Contributor angelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    10,677
    Archived
    5,706
    Total Posts
    16,383
    Rep Power
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by repoman View Post
    Angelo, what is your answer to post #1354?

    If I were moderator you would have to fully answer it or you be not allowed to post anymore in this thread.

    And this is not some topic like white privilege that can be danced around. This is impartial nuts and bolts physics.



    If the pump analogy is wrong prove it. How did CO2 get to 408 ppm?
    How did CO2 get to 1200 ppm long before homo sapiens started burning fossil fuels?

    During the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today.Jun 7, 2017
    During the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today. The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm — about 18 times higher than today.Jun 7, 2017
    Here's a better graph of CO2 and temperature for the last 600 ...

    https://medium.com › heres-a-better-graph-of-co2-and-temperature-for-the-l...

  5. Top | #1365
    Contributor repoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6,302
    Archived
    2,280
    Total Posts
    8,582
    Rep Power
    73
    Ok, then any talk about humans putting out a "tiny amount of CO2 compared to nature" should not appear in any more of your posts or you will be a manipulative LIAR via irrelevant distraction over an already conceded point.
    Sam Smith is a He.

  6. Top | #1366
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    1,751
    Archived
    7,585
    Total Posts
    9,336
    Rep Power
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by angelo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by repoman View Post
    Angelo, what is your answer to post #1354?

    If I were moderator you would have to fully answer it or you be not allowed to post anymore in this thread.

    And this is not some topic like white privilege that can be danced around. This is impartial nuts and bolts physics.



    If the pump analogy is wrong prove it. How did CO2 get to 408 ppm?
    How did CO2 get to 1200 ppm long before homo sapiens started burning fossil fuels?
    Is this an admission that you can’t answer the question?


    Klobuchar: have you ever blacked out?
    Kavanaugh: have you?

Similar Threads

  1. Today there is a report of how to time travel.
    By George S in forum Natural Science
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-28-2019, 09:56 PM
  2. Global Warming to Climate change to Climate Catastrophe.
    By T.G.G. Moogly in forum Natural Science
    Replies: 152
    Last Post: 10-20-2018, 06:07 PM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-02-2018, 12:00 AM
  4. Climate Change Fanatics Confront Growing Evil - Climate Lukewarmers
    By maxparrish in forum Political Discussions
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 01-28-2015, 03:11 AM
  5. Ezell Ford autopsy report released
    By ksen in forum Political Discussions
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 01-01-2015, 04:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •