Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Before Darwin, was deism or atheism the most reasonable position?

  1. Top | #21
    Veteran Member Cheerful Charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    4,256
    Archived
    3,884
    Total Posts
    8,140
    Rep Power
    55
    For at least a century before Darwin, educated people in Europe, especially England knew evolution had happened. It was well discussed, investigated and debated as to how it occurred. Darwin merely discovered the important principle that explained how evolution worked. One key to that understanding was the discovery that the earth was immensely old by people such as Charles Lyell, whose books Darwin took with him on his voyage of the Beagle. Lots of pieces of the evolution puzzle were being worked out. Which is why Wallace also put the pieces together similarly to Darwin. Demonstrating the discovering the roots of evolution was inevitable. There was so much work being done on evolution, had Darwin and Wallace never existed, somebody else would have sooner or later come up with natural selection.
    Cheerful Charlie

  2. Top | #22
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    7
    Atheism actually dates back to ancient Greece and Rome in the West (see Battling the Gods by Tim Whitmarsh). They made some arguments that were very much the same as those we're familiar with now. I'd say at least some of their reasons were indeed cogent. Atheism itself dates back even earlier to ancient India, with the Carvaka philosophy.

  3. Top | #23
    Veteran Member skepticalbip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Searching for reality along the long and winding road
    Posts
    4,487
    Archived
    12,976
    Total Posts
    17,463
    Rep Power
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by mcc1789 View Post
    Atheism actually dates back to ancient Greece and Rome in the West (see Battling the Gods by Tim Whitmarsh). They made some arguments that were very much the same as those we're familiar with now. I'd say at least some of their reasons were indeed cogent. Atheism itself dates back even earlier to ancient India, with the Carvaka philosophy.
    “Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.”

    ~ Seneca the Younger Roman Philosopher 1st century A.D.

  4. Top | #24
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    4,511
    Rep Power
    23
    Atheism was always the most rational position, b/c even the most minimalist deism is logically inconsistent, presuming that the world must have a creator but somehow a creator could exist without it's own creator.

    OTOH, I think Dawkins is correct that the ToE really put the last intellectual nail in the coffin of theism. The flawed argument from design was still by far the best psuedo intellectual argument for a creator. That argument already suffered from fatal logical flaws, but the ToE came along and directly refuted one of it's core premises, which is that there is no process other than a goal-driven mind that can produce a complex thing that serves some function.

    It is easier to fool oneself into buying into a logically flawed argument structure or accepting premises that are baseless but not known falsehoods, than fool oneself by accepting a premise that is a known falsehood. The ToE forced deists and all theists to do the latter, which made any form of theism too intellectually dishonest for many, and thus lead to the rise of secularism where there are not only increasing non-theists, but a majority of label-only "theists" who don't really take the idea of God seriously.

    The religious fundies are quite correct to resist and fear the ToE. "Moderate" theists who pretend they accept evolution are lying to themselves either about their theism or what evolution logically implies.

  5. Top | #25
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by skepticalbip View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mcc1789 View Post
    Atheism actually dates back to ancient Greece and Rome in the West (see Battling the Gods by Tim Whitmarsh). They made some arguments that were very much the same as those we're familiar with now. I'd say at least some of their reasons were indeed cogent. Atheism itself dates back even earlier to ancient India, with the Carvaka philosophy.
    “Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.”

    ~ Seneca the Younger Roman Philosopher 1st century A.D.
    Apparently it was really said by someone else, possibly Edward Gibbon.https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:S...seful.22_Quote

  6. Top | #26
    Veteran Member skepticalbip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Searching for reality along the long and winding road
    Posts
    4,487
    Archived
    12,976
    Total Posts
    17,463
    Rep Power
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by mcc1789 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by skepticalbip View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mcc1789 View Post
    Atheism actually dates back to ancient Greece and Rome in the West (see Battling the Gods by Tim Whitmarsh). They made some arguments that were very much the same as those we're familiar with now. I'd say at least some of their reasons were indeed cogent. Atheism itself dates back even earlier to ancient India, with the Carvaka philosophy.
    “Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.”

    ~ Seneca the Younger Roman Philosopher 1st century A.D.
    Apparently it was really said by someone else, possibly Edward Gibbon.https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:S...seful.22_Quote
    Interesting... the writer of that piece can't find the quote in Seneca's writings or in Edward Gibbon's writings but prefers to credit Gibbon or maybe someone unknown who assumed from a misreading Gibbon's witings that it was a quote from Seneca.

  7. Top | #27
    Industrial Grade Linguist Copernicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Bellevue, WA
    Posts
    2,225
    Rep Power
    10
    I think that the Greek philosophers and religions were strongly influenced by Indians and Persians even before Alexander invaded their territory. Hinduism and Buddhism also generated atheistic and materialistic movements that were denigrated by believers, e.g. the Charvaka and Lokayata traditions in India.

    Non-materialist skeptics, i.e. most skeptics, have tended to be deists--believers in immaterial forces and causes that likely had nothing to do with conventional ideas about personal deities. Samuel Clemmens (Mark Twain) was a good example of a deist skeptic, but his sort of deism was very popular with prominent individuals since at least revolutionary times.

    I was never impressed with Dawkins' somewhat parochial perspective on the role of Darwin in creating a kind of watershed moment for atheism. Belief in common descent through some unknown process was already widespred when he came along. What Darwin did was provide a clearer alternative to the Argument from Design that was the prevailing point of view among European theologians, scientists, and philosophers of his time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •