Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: A Calgary Agency Just Trademarked “Fake News” So Trump Can’t Use It Anymore

  1. Top | #1
    Loony Running The Asylum ZiprHead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Do you like my pretty crown?
    Posts
    15,379
    Archived
    3,034
    Total Posts
    18,413
    Rep Power
    88

    A Calgary Agency Just Trademarked “Fake News” So Trump Can’t Use It Anymore

    https://www.narcity.com/news/ca/ab/c...t-use-the-term

    We assure you, this is not "fake news" — it really happened. Wax Partnership in Calgary and the Society of Professional Journalists launched a video and website earlier this week along with their campaign.

    “How do you stop the incorrect use of the term 'fake news'? You trademark it,” reads the Fake News (™pending) website.
    ITMFA

    When conservatives realize they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will abandon democracy.

    You submit to tyranny when you renounce truth. - Timothy Snyder

  2. Top | #2
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    25,077
    Archived
    96,752
    Total Posts
    121,829
    Rep Power
    97
    Think that will stop them??

    Besides, don't you need to actually use your trademark in order to get protection?

  3. Top | #3
    Contributor Trausti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Northwest
    Posts
    5,495
    Archived
    372
    Total Posts
    5,867
    Rep Power
    59
    Idiots. That’s not how trademark works.

  4. Top | #4
    Content Thief Elixir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Mountains
    Posts
    11,369
    Archived
    707
    Total Posts
    12,076
    Rep Power
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Trausti View Post
    Idiots. That’s not how trademark works.
    Right. Not even in theory. In theory, you can trademark a word or phrase for a market application. In reality, the breadth of the protection provided depends entirely on the depth of your pockets and your willingness to dig into them to pay lawyers. Sending out cease and desist letters is easy. Obtaining judgments is not. So in the end it all comes down to the zeal of whoever holds the mark.

    We once had a trademark for a product line - a made-up word that ended with "bak". It didn't take long for the Company who owns Camelbak™ to come after us, even though we were nowhere near the Camelbak™ market, and the word did not resemble "Camelbak" in any respect other than the last three letters. Our lawyers looked at it and discovered that the Camelbak™ mark holders had actually gone to bat against, among many others, a Vodka manufacturer who had put out a product with "bak" at the end. Per our lawyers, we - or the vodka people - would have won, but not until after spending hundreds of thousands or millions contesting it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •